Science

If I seem to have gone quiet for a couple of days, it's because I've been having my brain re-wired.

It all started when I found Rich Gibbens' site www.powerrunning.com. Rich has got the finest collection I've seen of science-based articles questioning the "more miles the better" school of thought. The "aerobic madness" theory has dominated distance running -- and caused so many injuries and wrecked careers -- for too long. It's way past time for a change.

But change is hard: it hurts the brain.

Rich is one of a handful of independent thinkers who are closely examining what the latest research into training, physiology, biology and genetics, has to tell us about running faster. If the conclusions were put into practice, they would revolutionize the way we train. But you only need to look at the advice in Runners' World and Running Times and suchlike to realise that it's not going to happen any time soon.

TRAINING – SCIENCE RANT
13.2 miles of trail running in sub-10 minute miles. Sunny and hot (for me) – much solar radiation helping me work on my cancer-tan.

A few days ago, Jo emailed me a Sound Science Initiative Alert – which is something from the Union of Concerned Scientists. Frankly I didn’t know what to make of it – and spent some time reading about the issues. Basically it points to data that threatens the habitat and existence of Polar Bears.

Maybe its a bad thing for a species at the TOP OF THE FOOD CHAIN to die off?

What kind of cascading effect will this have on our gorgeous planet and the oh so delicate balance of nature? What is this teaching us?